Then POSIX ACLs are still the way to go for the moment, though ZFS ACL's seems pretty robust.
Volker, may I ask what is the trend now: are people switching to ACEs now or still stick with POSIX ? Dragos On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Volker Lendecke <volker.lende...@sernet.de>wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:12:02PM +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote: > > Seems resonable, zfsacl stores the ACE's natively compared to acl_xattr > > that makes > > use of extended attributes. > > > > It seems that the big players (Oracle, IBM) made their own tools. > > > > Any idea of the strict mapping completeness among zfsacl and acl_xattr ? > > Closer than posix acls, but depending on your requirements > still pretty bad for some aspects of ACLs. In particular > inheritance based things are not covered properly, and chown > operations have very different semantics. > > Volker > > -- > SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen > phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 > AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen > http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kont...@sernet.de > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
