-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fermin Molina wrote: >> Samba assumes posix locking semantics on the filesystem. >> NFS locking is broken. You might try setting >> 'strict locking = no'. If that doesn't work, you might >> try 'posix locking = no' just as a test. > > Well, but I think the problem isn't located in the locking > of NFS files; smbd daemons always get stalled doing a lock > of "local" locking.tdb file. Then, must be broken the > ext3 locking? In any case, maybe it's broken all locking > system in linux kernel...
I understand the problem description. I stand by my suggestion. > Regarding another subject, I cannot try those settings > because now that the information is 'local' to samba > machine and not further mounted from the NFS server, there > haven't been any problems... OK. cheers, jerry ===================================================================== I live in a Reply-to-All world ----------------------- Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEBbPsIR7qMdg1EfYRAihKAJ4u8AN8XYBzU0Aow24dyT1QRUOwlgCfZCmq EkEhQGYkv0gmojOFs2UdjDM= =yfnZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
