While slower, it has benefits for something like a database server. For a home
machine, the added expense and slower speed are not worth it. Not exactly a
definitive answer as there is gray area but for a production server, I'd throw
in ecc
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:26:25
To:samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: OT: ECC Memory - WAS: Re: [Samba] Possible Filesystem Corruption
with Samba 3.0.25a (with XFS and LVM)
>> The best way I've ever found to reliably find bad memory is compile
>> something big, like X. If your memory is bad, you'll find out pretty
>> quick...
> The real solution is to use ECC memory. :)
Curious...
I recall reading somewhere that ECC memory was considerably slower than
non-ECC, and its benefits was mostly sales hype - ie, its ECC was not
precisely reliable...
Anyone know of an authoritative answer to this question?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
