perhaps it is not a good idea to use the same names for a Unix User and
the AD User.

If for example you have unix-user xyz with uid=7738

and an AD-User xyz so the AD-USer xyz gets via winbind perhaps uid=199300

What answer should
id xyz

give?

Bardo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> I posted this last week but haven't heard anything. I'm not sure if this
> is because nobody knows the answer (can't believe that!) or I'm missing
> something obvious in the documentation and people are thinking "Read The
> Fine Manual". Whatever the reason, if anyone has any insights into this
> problem I'd be very grateful for their comments.
> 
> We're using Samba 3.0.23b (binaries downloaded from Sunfreeware) on
> Solaris 9 as a member server, using "security = DOMAIN" in an Active
> Directory 2003 domain. The server is primarily an application server,
> running SAS software, but we have a share to Windows to enable users to
> save programs and data from their Windows XP workstations. Historically
> we've been using PC Netlink, Sun's version of Lanman, but this isn't
> compatible with AD 2003 so we need to move to Samba.
> 
> We're struggling to establish a mapping between domain user accounts and
> UNIX user accounts that are similarly named (the same naming convention
> is used for both). My understanding of Samba, albeit sketchy, was that
> it could automatically make a mapping between local and domain accounts
> of the same name. However, this doesn't appear to be happening. If I set
> a file's permissions for a specified user in Solaris it appears in the
> file's security within Windows, but the user is listed as a Unix User
> along the lines of:
> 
> u123456 (Unix User\u123456)
> 
> I was expecting that there should be an implicit mapping between u123456
> in Solaris and domain\u123456 but maybe I've got the wrong end of the
> stick. We need to maintain the local users so that we can control who
> has access to the server software, and we maintain password aging both
> on the server and the domain so maintaining a separate password database
> for Samba would be a complication. an Extract from nsswitch.conf and
> (edited) smb.conf and included below.
> 
> As you will see from nsswitch.conf, we are using winbind. wbinfo will
> resolve any domain information and getent passwd will return domain user
> accounts.
> 
> Many thanks in advance.
> 
> nsswitch.conf:
> 
> passwd:     files winbind
> group:      files winbind
> 
> hosts:      files dns winbind
> 
> smb.conf:
> 
> [global]
>       workgroup = our-domain-name
>       netbios aliases = mc18unxa
> # dual nics: the netmask is correct for our network
>       interfaces = xx.xx.xxx.xx/255.255.240.0,
> yy.yy.yyy.yy/255.255.240.0
>       security = DOMAIN
>       null passwords = Yes
>       password server = *
>       passdb backend = tdbsam
>       lanman auth = No
>       client NTLMv2 auth = Yes
>       client lanman auth = No
>       client plaintext auth = No
>       log level = 1
>       log file = /var/samba/log/log.%m
>       max log size = 50000
>       load printers = No
>       dns proxy = No
>       ldap ssl = no
>       idmap uid = 10000-100000000
>       idmap gid = 10000-100000000
>       winbind enum users = Yes
>       winbind enum groups = Yes
>       winbind use default domain = Yes
>       create mask = 0644
>       directory mask = 0775
>       hosts deny = none
>       case sensitive = No
>       preserve case = No
>       domain master = no
>       local master = no
>       preferred master = no
>       os level = 0
> 
> [dosptn]
>       path = /dosptn
>       read only = No
>       inherit permissions = Yes
>       guest ok = Yes
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> Nigel Pain
> The Scottish Government
> Corporate Systems Support
> Information Systems and Information Services (ISIS)
> Victoria Quay 
> EDINBURGH 
> EH6 6QQ 
> UK
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ********************************************************
> 
> This e-mail (and any files or other attachments transmitted with it) is 
> intended solely for the attention of the addressee(s).  Unauthorised use, 
> disclosure, storage, copying or distribution of any part of this e-mail is 
> not permitted.  If you are not the intended recipient please destroy the 
> email, remove any copies from your system and inform the sender immediately 
> by return.
> 
>  
> 
> Communications with the Scottish Government may be monitored or recorded in 
> order to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful 
> purposes.  The views or opinions contained within this e-mail may not 
> necessarily reflect those of the Scottish Government.
> 
> ********************************************************
> 
> 
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure 
> Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership 
> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi 
> this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or 
> recorded for legal purposes.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to