On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:20 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:35:39AM -0800, rhubbell wrote: > > Why do cifs and smbfs not have this capability? Is it too much work? Is > > it due to differences in the purpose of each? > > It's fiddly work nobody has done yet.
fiddly = not hard work, but tedious and sort of annoying? > > > Is there a way to setup smbclient to act like a mount point acts? I'm > > pretty sure the answer's "No." but I ask anyway. > > What do you mean by that? You want to slow down smbclient? Ha, lol, no. My question was probably ridiculous beyond comprehension. Was asking if there was a way to make use of smbclient to replace cifs or smbfs. > > > Is this definition correct? > > > > Multiplex ID: > > Used by the server to verify the file access permissions of groups where > > consumer-based file protection is in effect. > > No, that is not correct. See > http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=89836 for a > description of CIFS, alternatively look at > http://ubiqx.org/cifs. Thanks for those links, that definition I found definitely had me scratching my head. > > Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba