On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:25 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:41:55AM -0800, rhubbell wrote: > > > > Why do cifs and smbfs not have this capability? Is it too much work? Is > > > > it due to differences in the purpose of each? > > > > > > It's fiddly work nobody has done yet. > > > > fiddly = not hard work, but tedious and sort of annoying? > > Fiddly as in not many of lines of code, but code with > complex interactions and data dependencies. So I'd say for > me it is hard work, others might find it easier. But as > nobody has done it yet, I'd say I'm not completely alone in > that assessment.
Ah, ok, understood, thanks. So it falls into the class of enhancements under the heading "Worthy but tricky". -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba