Jeff Adams wrote: > At 07:42 PM 12/06/2002 -0500, Michael J. Cook wrote: > > >Now the theory... > > > >Windows ODBC is built to work with the Win2k OS (obviously). The OS sees > >the 10 > >connection limit that the ODBC is trying to exceed, refuses additional > >connections, and somehow kills ODBC and/or Sambar dbms stops responding. > > > >If I'm way out in left field, start calling me back in right now ;-)) > > I believe Sambar is making the ODBC calls and as such, the 10 connection > limit does not apply because the calls are local. The web requests from > the remote clients that make those requests do not actually count as > file/print connections. Where you might see this apply is if more than 10 > clients had direct ODBC links to a database housed on your computer. In > that case, the connections would count as file share connections. > > -Jeff > ------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
Doh! Of course. I forgot that the ODBC calls are local to the machine. Well, I'm fresh out of theories as to the 10 connection limit. Unless Microsoft's ODBC drivers impose the 10 connection limitation? ------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
