At 01:42 07.12.2002 Michael J. Cook wrote: >Why should Sambar be set up as an app and not a service? I thought there were >performance, functionality (fail then restart), and security advantages to >running as a service.
I meant that Windows doesn't see Sambar, runnign either as an app or service as one of its native file & printing services. These native services are the one which are bound to the 10 connections, anything else is an app for Windows. You can run practically any executable as a services but I don't believe the the connection restictions apply to these. Under NT4, I remember there was an "ilegal" registry mod to over-ride these limits. >I gather from the list archives that the 10 connection limit applied to Windows >file and print sharing. However, the "System Resource Exceeded" error message >only occurred with Sambar's dbms functionality. If you have an event in your Windows logs refeering to this, pls save that event log and mail it to me or send me the event ID plus description. We're bound to find out what it is.. :-) Alex ------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
