On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 14:56 +0200, Ralph D. Ungermann wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Ralph D. Ungermann wrote: > >> > >> I'm about to adapt the teco3 backend to the VM6552. > >> > >> My question: Is there still any public interest in backends for > >> such old scanners? > > > m. allan noah wrote: > > though there may not be much interest, we will accept patches if you > > get it working and it compiles cleanly. we might even make you > > maintainer of the code if you are not careful :) > > > My scanner now runs fine! But unfortunately, it turned out to be not a > patch, but a major rewrite (with 30% less lines). I presume, that my > backend also solves major issues for the other supported scanners, > chiefly with color scans and responsiveness (to cancel). But I have no > way to test it for other teco models, and I don't want to fool millions > of happy teco3 users. > > If there is anybody else out there using backend teco1, teco2, or teco3, > I'm willing to unify and maintain that driver. But now I sit idle, until > somebody googles and finds this email... > > Meanwhile: Anyone here need help coding or reviewing his code? > > -- ralph > > > >
Hello Ralph, I am the maintainer of the teco2 backend, if you have a link (or send a zip file with data to mailbox) to your backend i can have a look and add improvements to the teco2 backend. http://gkall.hobby.nl/scanner.html PS. Frank Zago is the maintainer for the teco1 and teco3 backend. -- -------- m.vr.gr. Gerard Klaver
