On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 14:56 +0200, Ralph D. Ungermann wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Ralph D. Ungermann wrote:
> >>
> >>  I'm about to adapt the teco3 backend to the VM6552.
> >>
> >>  My question: Is there still any public interest in backends for
> >>  such old scanners?
> 
> 
> m. allan noah wrote:
> > though there may not be much interest, we will accept patches if you
> > get it working and it compiles cleanly. we might even make you
> > maintainer of the code if you are not careful :)
> 
> 
> My scanner now runs fine! But unfortunately, it turned out to be not a 
> patch, but a major rewrite (with 30% less lines). I presume, that my 
> backend also solves major issues for the other supported scanners, 
> chiefly with color scans and responsiveness (to cancel). But I have no 
> way to test it for other teco models, and I don't want to fool millions 
> of happy teco3 users.
> 
> If there is anybody else out there using backend teco1, teco2, or teco3, 
> I'm willing to unify and maintain that driver. But now I sit idle, until 
> somebody googles and finds this email...
> 
> Meanwhile: Anyone here need help coding or reviewing his code?
> 
> -- ralph
> 
> 
> 
> 

Hello Ralph,

I am the maintainer of the teco2 backend, if you have a link (or send a
zip file with data to mailbox) to your backend i can have a look and add
improvements to the teco2 backend.

http://gkall.hobby.nl/scanner.html



PS. Frank Zago is the maintainer for the teco1 and teco3 backend.
-- 
--------
m.vr.gr.
Gerard Klaver


Reply via email to