On Sep 30, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Charles Matthew Chen wrote:

   Second, I've replaced the headers of all of the source files with
the standard Apache header including the Apache license info. So, the
code is ready to commit once the code grant is approved.

The code grant is just part of the incubation process, so as soon as
we figure out where it goes, you can check it in. The more important
thing is the structure of the repository. Since we've discussed maven
and jackrabbit as a model for the repository, just agreement of where
to put the code is sufficient now.

...
For now, let's focus on getting the code into the repo and get some
builds done to replicate what is available outside Apache so the
community can start to migrate to using the Apache builds.

Craig

  I believe we've agreed on Maven.

I've heard no dissent.

  Have we settled on emulating the project structure of Jackrabbit?

I think so. To double check, you could always build the sanselan structure as you would model Jackrabbit, create a patch using svn and everyone could take a look.

  Also, does anyone see a reason to use sub-projects?

Not from my perspective.

Craig

Charles.

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to