I'm going to follow Craig's suggestion and propose a structure with a patch this weekend.
Charles. On 10/1/07, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > > As Carsten can guess I'm not thrilled about that but won't object. It's > > just that I have very little patience in case Maven causes me to lose a > > lot of time again because it's unstable and pops up a different error > > message each time you run it. But that was on Cocoon which is much more > > complex. We'll see what happens. > Nowadays Maven runs much more smoothly - and with Sanselan we won't have > many dependencies anyway, so it *should* work painlessly :) If not, we > have enough knowledge to fix the issues (hopefully)... > > > > > Another point: Currently Sanselan requires Java 1.4 according to the > > website. I'd like that to remain so for the time being in order to > > maximize the number of possible users. > > > Yes, good point. > > Now, the question for me now is, when we can expect the code drop into > our svn? Afaik we are through with paper work and Charles could commit > his stuff, right? > > Carsten > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
