Good job.
+1 for release of the artifacts in the http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/dist/incubator/sanselan/0.96/
directory.
I've downloaded the public key and verified signatures for two of the
artifacts. So the public key and process are good.
Since we have the required three +1 votes from Incubator PMC members
(Jeremias, Carsten, and me), all we need is a lazy consensus vote in
general at incubator. No need to respin and revote.
Craig
On Jan 14, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Charles Matthew Chen wrote:
Hello all,
Thanks for the feedback.
I've fixed the following problems:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Philipp Koch <[email protected]> wrote:
* licence, notice, header, readme and release-notes files are OK
except:
- release-notes state: Release 0.95 instead of Release 0.96
I've fixed this.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Philipp Koch <[email protected]> wrote:
- README.txt: state Collective work: Copyright 2007-2008 The Apache
Software Foundation. mustn't in be 2007 - 2009
- NOTICE.txt: same as README.txt
I've fixed this.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]
> wrote:
I think the key to verify the release should be available on a public
server.
I've added my key to MIT and the SKS Network.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keyserver
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keyserver-upload
No one seems to consider the problems with README.txt, NOTICE.txt
or RELEASE_NOTES to be blockers, so I haven't generated a new version
of the release. Should this vote be considered complete and move to
the general incubator list? I'd like to wait until at least Craig is
+1 and make sure the other voters' votes are no longer conditional.
Thanks,
Charles
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
