Thanks, Craig.
+1 for me, then.
This concludes the voting on this list. Here is a tally of the votes:
+1
Carsten Ziegeler
Charles Matthew Chen
Craig L Russell
Jeremias Maerki
Philipp Koch
0
none
-1:
none
The vote passes. Thanks to everyone for voting.
I have posted on gene...@incubator for IPMC review and approval.
Charles
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Craig L Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Good job.
>
> +1 for release of the artifacts in the
> http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/dist/incubator/sanselan/0.96/ directory.
>
> I've downloaded the public key and verified signatures for two of the
> artifacts. So the public key and process are good.
>
> Since we have the required three +1 votes from Incubator PMC members
> (Jeremias, Carsten, and me), all we need is a lazy consensus vote in general
> at incubator. No need to respin and revote.
>
> Craig
>
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Charles Matthew Chen wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>
>> I've fixed the following problems:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Philipp Koch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> * licence, notice, header, readme and release-notes files are OK except:
>>> - release-notes state: Release 0.95 instead of Release 0.96
>>
>> I've fixed this.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Philipp Koch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> - README.txt: state Collective work: Copyright 2007-2008 The Apache
>>> Software Foundation. mustn't in be 2007 - 2009
>>> - NOTICE.txt: same as README.txt
>>
>> I've fixed this.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think the key to verify the release should be available on a public
>>> server.
>>
>> I've added my key to MIT and the SKS Network.
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keyserver
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keyserver-upload
>>
>> No one seems to consider the problems with README.txt, NOTICE.txt
>> or RELEASE_NOTES to be blockers, so I haven't generated a new version
>> of the release. Should this vote be considered complete and move to
>> the general incubator list? I'd like to wait until at least Craig is
>> +1 and make sure the other voters' votes are no longer conditional.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Charles
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected]
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
