My customer basically 'outsourced' the search functionality to an external search provider company, so I abandoned my plans regarding haystack and SOLR. SOLR was a bit daunting to me, but the docs seemed good (I got the example up and running in short order), and haystack made it look like it was going to be pretty straight-forward. Defining a good search is hard, though -- making it return enough but not too much -- no doubt about that.
--Stuart On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Josh <[email protected]> wrote: > I know that there have been threads on this before but I am curious of > what the current status is. Here: > http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users/browse_thread/thread/d99c68ea6e2504be/064bb6fd8aedffb2 > and here: > http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users/browse_thread/thread/6f7fea8686f0508f/9727d67597f7f709 > Stuart Laughlin referenced that he was working on some sort of faceted > search/navigation. I was wondering if anyone knows the status of that > or maybe Stuart could comment? Has anyone else had experience or > success with this? I think I'm going to take a whack at it and see > what happens. > > -Josh > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Satchmo users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
