Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota : >> > Is there a reason for using dimensions 60*7? And should we implement a >> > way for admins to change this default value (other than editing the >> > SQL tables directly)? >> >> I think we should provide sensible values from the start. Site admin >> configuration is dense enough I'am afraid. >> I would be happy if there was more rows in the description field. But >> the width should not be changed. 78 characters for a line is maximum >> but 60 seems to be safe solution to avoid the box being larger than >> the part of the page its stands. If someone got a too small box, he's >> likely to have a very specific font size configuration on his browser. > > Ok, though for the record, a width of 82 just fits right in the page > with Mozilla Firefox in my old 800*600 laptop.
Max is 78, as most terminal are 80. (On all the computers I use, from 1600x1200 to 1024x768, from 21" to 13,5", 60 is more than usable). -- Mathieu Roy +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ | | Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ | | Not a native english speaker: | | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
