> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:57 AM Ineiev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In contrast, sv_membersh is distributed under the AGPL; now, > > the AGPL does include the same provisions, but also adds Section 13 > > requiring that our modified version prominently offer all users > > interacting with it remotely an opportunity to receive > > the corresponding source of our version; and AGPL Section 13 has > > nothing like "you needn't make it do so if it doesn't."
Also, if sv_membersh is copyrighted to the FSF a simple solution would be relicensing it to avoid this requirement.
