On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 02:04:11PM -0400, Ian Kelling wrote: > > I definitely admire the ingenuity to offer source code in more > places. However, I'm pretty confident Savannah webpages are a sufficient > place to satisfy the AGPL requirement of offering source, and adding > output like this to command line operations where the only expected > output is information related to the operation is undesirable for > various reasons and will very likely cause breakage for scripts and > tools which make calls to Savannah.
I'm aware that it interfered with Karl's scripts; I'm also aware that it works fine with GNUN scripts, the scripts updating www.gnu.org pages and Emacs-to-CVS interface, so I wouldn't say it's really very likely to break tools. The modified script has been running for a month on vcs1 and for over four months on download0, it can wait for a day or two for rms' clarifications. we seldom have such opportunities to gather users' feedback, they occur much rarelier than, say, the fundraiser.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature