Le Thursday 24 January 2008 08:51:37 David Baelde, vous avez écrit : > Otherwise, I'm wondering if we should not have the two behaviours: > wait a bit for the buffer to empty, but if it hasn't moved in a few > seconds, then drop data. This could be done by waiting on Read and > Delay in the Duppy scheduler. Note that there is no need to wait long, > since if the harbor/http source is being pulled, the next round of > output will occur very soon; otherwise, if the source is currently > unused, dropping is harmless.
Yes it's a good idea indeed. We have a vaery good scheduler now, using it extensively is the less we can do :-) Would you handle that or do you prefer that I do it ? Romain
