On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Peter Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to really call this design the first generation of rocket, > I'd also like any suggestions for a more soapy name for the gui,
Your burst of activity on rocket is very promising, and it seems to have already paid. It'd be sweet to see your tool usable by other people! For the soapy name, I don't know... soapbox, soap opera ? or just soapy ? or the liquidsoap rocket ? I think I like soapbox best. (About dia and graphical composition of liq scripts in general: it doesn't have to (although it can) be in the second generation of rocket. To me, it's better to have separate tools that do well specific tasks. It allows more flexibility in the choice of language and approach. The only limitation is when it makes it more complicated for users.) > So let's say I queue a track in a mixer, I want to also be able to use > an add operation onto that track so that I play a dry jingle during > the intro. Cheers and keep up the good work! -- David
