Hello all, just a small update. The current state of soapbox looks like http://www.theneb.co.uk/soapBox-Vamp1.png, it's on the trunk at the moment as this. After playing around with pygtk layouts this evening it seems the best for now.
But I do want to play a bit with the info & jingles box sizes. The visual look I'm going to leave for a while and I'm going to concentrate firstly on organizing the widgets into nice looking objects and putting the pygtk interface working over it. Oh and I am breaking the heart of gnome nutters but I figured out the trick ardour pulls off for a dark theme, I had to use bash and export a gtk variable but it works. I'd like to sometime in the future mix rounded & square objects together, but I'm not fully read up on the theming of gnome yet. On 26/03/2008, Peter Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I aprericate the kind comments, for the past year the development has > been quite slow and I've been able to change now, but I'm not at least > at a point to get some rapid development done and get something really > useful out that people can use. > > I'll also probably take the name soapbox, it fits in nicer and my plan > is to leave rocket (with the threading fixed) frozen, then start with > soapbox reusing rocket code. > I'm going to embark on the main page layout today (ie whats in that > screenshot), as a lot of considerations need to be taken on the > further design of the backend. > > > On 26/03/2008, David Baelde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Peter Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd like to really call this design the first generation of rocket, > > > I'd also like any suggestions for a more soapy name for the gui, > > > > > > Your burst of activity on rocket is very promising, and it seems to > > have already paid. It'd be sweet to see your tool usable by other > > people! For the soapy name, I don't know... soapbox, soap opera ? or > > just soapy ? or the liquidsoap rocket ? I think I like soapbox best. > > > > (About dia and graphical composition of liq scripts in general: it > > doesn't have to (although it can) be in the second generation of > > rocket. To me, it's better to have separate tools that do well > > specific tasks. It allows more flexibility in the choice of language > > and approach. The only limitation is when it makes it more complicated > > for users.) > > > > > > > So let's say I queue a track in a mixer, I want to also be able to use > > > an add operation onto that track so that I play a dry jingle during > > > the intro. > > > > > > Cheers and keep up the good work! > > -- > > > > David > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > > just about anything Open Source. > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Savonet-devl mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-devl > > > > > > -- > > Peter Brooks > -- Peter Brooks
