Le 24/05/2011 21:13, Samuel Mimram a écrit : > Hi, > > Unfortunately, it is not currently possible to stream data without > reencoding. We are looking into this but it will certainly be after > 1.0... >
This. would. be. awesome. Great automation & toolkit from liquidsoap, but without the need to re-encode, that would be great.. I have no idea how hard it can be on the code site, but I look forward to playing with it ;) Cheers, Gilou > ++ > > Sam. > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Brandon > Casci<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm not certain, but maybe you can configure liquidsoap to use an >> external encoder, but it won't do any encoding. It just echo back >> all the data. I think the drawback for this method might be so >> support for multiple streams. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On May 24, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Alexander<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, i've noticed that liquidsoap requires many cpu resources >>> while streaming mp3. I understand, that reencoding of music file >>> is not cheap... but i can do it before streaming& making >>> playlists. Is it possible somehow run liquidsoap without >>> reencoding? >>> >>> Another problem that puts me in trouble is to make 2 or 3 streams >>> in different bitrate without reencoding, but with the same >>> playlist. Of course, i can prepare 2 copies of file in different >>> bitrates.. but is it possible to run liquidsoap without >>> reencoding& synchronize 2 daemons? >>> >>> I believe that liquisoap can do everything :) >>> >>> -- Kind regards, Alexander. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
