Run "uname -a" once to check your installed version. I'm not sure if you can install 64bit software on a 32bit system.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 07:25:52AM -0700, greg heil wrote: > Chris > > Well that could be good for me ... the machine IS a (duo) 64b! How do > i convince Synaptic of that though? i believe at install i used the > 32b option instead.It would be rather misteak prone to do a direct > install, especially as i do not know, yet, how to do that properly. > > greg > ~krsnadas.org > > -- > > from: Christopher Roy Bratusek [email protected] > to: [email protected] > date: 24 August 2012 01:33 > subject: Re: [Sawfish] installing sawfish in xubuntu > > Ahh... my repo only has AMD64, no i386. But you could download the > sources and compile from those (since it's deb-src it will tell you > about missing deps) > > Regards > > -- > > from: greg heil [email protected] > to: [email protected] > date: 23 August 2012 17:39 > subject: Re: [Sawfish] installing sawfish in xubuntu > > Chris > > Synaptic failed to install Sawfish saying: > > "Could not apply changes! Fix broken packages firs." > > Perhaps it is because when i updated the package list a dialog said: > > GPG error: http://apt.nanolx.org photonic InRelease: The following > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not > available: NO_PUBKEY 4B9D3375057549E2Failed to fetch > http://apt.nanolx.org/dists/photonic/main/binary-i386/Packages 500 > Internal Server Error Some index files failed to download. They have > been ignored, or old ones used instead. > > BTW the Starfish-pager is not marked as coming from nano... > > greg > ~krsnadas.org > > -- > Sawfish ML > -- Sawfish ML
