I wouldn't say that NTO Spider is a "sort of" dynamic web scanner. It is a top 
tier scanner that can battle head to head on false negative rate with the big 
conglomerates' scanners: IBM AppScan and HP WebInspect.  Larry Suto published 
an analysis a year ago, that certainly had some flaws (and was rightly 
criticized), but genuinely showed all three to be in the same league. I haven't 
seen a better head-to-head analysis conducted by anyone. A little bird 
whispered to me that we may see a new analysis by someone soon. 

As a group of security practitioners it is amazing to me that we don't have 
more quantifiable testing and tools/services are just dismissed with anecdotal 
data.  I am glad NIST SATE '09 will soon be underway and, at least for static 
analysis tools, we will have unbiased independent testing. I am hoping for a 
big improvement over last year.  I especially like the category they are using 
for some flaws found as "valid but insignificant". Clearly they are improving 
based on feedback from SATE '08.

Veracode was the first company to offer static and dynamic (web) analysis, and 
we have been for 2 years (announced Aug 8, 2007).  We deliver it as a service. 
If you have a .NET or Java web app, you would cannot find a comparable solution 
form a single vendor today.

-Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org [mailto:sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org] On 
Behalf Of Arian J. Evans
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 1:41 PM
To: Matt Fisher
Cc: Kenneth Van Wyk; Secure Coding
Subject: Re: [SC-L] IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc.

Right now, officially, I think that is about it. IBM, Veracode, and
AoD (in Germany) claims they have this too.

As Mattyson mentioned, Veracode only does static binary analysis (no
source analysis). They offer "dynamic scanning" but I believe it is
using NTO Spider IIRC which is a simplified scanner that targets
unskilled users last I saw it.

At one point I believe Veracode was in discussions with SPI to use WI,
but since the Veracoders haunt this list I'll let them clarify what
they use if they want.

So IBM: soon.

Veracode: sort-of.

AoD: on paper

And more to come in short order no doubt. I think we all knew this was
coming sooner or later. Just a matter of "when".

The big guys have a lot of bucks to throw at this problem if they want
to, and pull off some really nice integrations. Be interesting to see
what they do, and how useful the integrations really are to
organizations.

-- 
Arian Evans





On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Matt Fisher<m...@piscis-security.com> wrote:
> Pretty much. Hp /spi has integrations as well but I don't recall devinspect 
> ever being a big hit.  Veracode does both as well as static binary but as 
> asaas model. Watchfire had a RAD integration as well iirc but it clearly must 
> not haved had the share ounce does.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasad Shenoy <prasad.she...@gmail.com>
> Sent: July 28, 2009 12:22 PM
> To: Kenneth Van Wyk <k...@krvw.com>
> Cc: Secure Coding <SC-L@securecoding.org>
> Subject: Re: [SC-L] IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc.
>
>
> Wow indeed. Does that makes IBM the only vendor to offer both Static
> and Dynamic software security testing/analysis capabilities?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Prasad N. Shenoy
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Kenneth Van Wyk<k...@krvw.com> wrote:
>> Wow, big acquisition news in the static code analysis space announced today:
>>
>> http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/07-28-2009/0005067166&EDATE=
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> -----
>> Kenneth R. van Wyk
>> KRvW Associates, LLC
>> http://www.KRvW.com
>>
>> (This email is digitally signed with a free x.509 certificate from CAcert.
>> If you're unable to verify the signature, try getting their root CA
>> certificate at http://www.cacert.org -- for free.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
>> List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
>> List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
>> SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
>> as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
> List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
> List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
> SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
> as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
> _______________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
> List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
> List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
> SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
> as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
> _______________________________________________
>

_______________________________________________
Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to