+1 for the ability to run Cluster ami's in Scalr.

On Jul 21, 11:47 pm, Donovan Bray <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looking at the whole roadmap the only things that peaked my interest
> are the following:
>
> Accounts and Environments
> Add team access to your Scalr account, with read/write permissions to
> your infrastructure (We need this)
> Add multiple Environments to your Scalr account, to use dedicated keys
> for your development and production environments, or to manage your
> clients (this is a reality for us, we have two scalr accounts that
> separate our corp instances from our production instances, and I would
> further like to separate our production instances from our development
> instances)
>
> To me its like legos. I need SCALR to make me the fundamental bricks
> that I can't build for myself, and then I can arrange those bricks
> into functional creations.
>
> I would like SCALR to be going gangbusters on the bricks like this
>
>    - Raid over EBS
>    - Accounts and Environments
>
> And to a much lesser extent services. (because if we really wanted
> these services any moderately skilled sys-admin can build them now
> with the tools you already provide, like I did with rsyslog). Don't do
> a service you don't love or consume yourselves, because once you offer
> it, your going to be married to it, support and all.
>
>    - integrated centralized logging with capable search UI.
>    - Scalable services (Cassandra, more suggestions? ffmpeg?)
>
> And leave the:
>
>    - Scalable apps (Drupal, more suggestions?)
>
> To the community, because this list won't end. The moment you have
> Drupal, you'll have a request for 10 other CMS's. Then the flames of
> why Drupal but not WordPress when you have to draw the line somewhere
> to stop the insanity.  There are enough services you could implement
> that will keep you busy so that you never ever have to touch a high
> level application such as these, and the SCALR community will be the
> better for it.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Sebastian Stadil <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the input, Donovan.
>
> > Anything on the Roadmap that you could be pushed back and replaced with
> > syslog-ng integration?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"scalr-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/scalr-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to