On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:35:53 -0400, Alex Shinn <[email protected]> wrote:
> As you say, there is no "=>" bound in (scheme base).
> So long as it's not bound in the usage context it will
> thus work with `cond'.
I forget, has the ramifications of this to the REPL semantics been
discussed? Some Schemes specifically treat all identifiers as implicitly
bound at the top-level in the REPL, which makes implicit auxiliary
keywords fail at the REPL, though they still work inside of libraries.
Aaron W. Hsu
--
Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
