On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, Andre van Tonder wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, Alex Shinn wrote:
- p57. How do we implement "=>" exported from (scheme base) module ?
?"=>" itself is not a syntax or a procedure (i think).
As you say, there is no "=>" bound in (scheme base).
So long as it's not bound in the usage context it will
thus work with `cond'.
I would also like to comment that literal keywords are bound in all current
R6RS-compatible implementations (including Chez and Larceny in my personal
experience)._______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports