On Wed 27 Apr 2011 08:56, "Aaron W. Hsu" <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:14:33 -0400, Andre van Tonder <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In otehr words, definitions introduced in macros can possibly shadow >> toplevel >> bindings, which is a major obstacle to safe hygienic macro programming. > > More than a major obstacle, I would argue that this violates hygiene and > should not be allowed in Scheme's hygienic macros. I would still appreciate pointers as to how to implement this ;-) Anyone can implement Scheme, but only half a dozen people have implemented separate compilation with hygienically introduced toplevel bindings. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
