scheme-reports  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] 4.1.7 Inclusion Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.1.7 Inclusion Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] 4.1.2 Literal expressions Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.1.2 Literal expressions Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] 2.1 Identifiers Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] 2.1 Identifiers Arthur A. Gleckler
• [Scheme-reports] 1.3.5 Naming conventions Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] 1.3.5 Naming conventions John Boyle
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] 1.3.5 Naming conventions John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] 1.3.3 Entry conventions Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] 1.3.3 Entry conventions John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] "the result is unspecified" vs "unspecified values" Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "the result is unspecified" vs "unspecified values" Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "the result is unspecified" vs "unspecified values" Andy Wingo
• [Scheme-reports] file-error?, read-error?, and specificity of error objects Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] file-error?, read-error?, and specificity of error objects John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] notes and thoughts on r7rs draft 8 Andy Wingo
• [Scheme-reports] equivalent rewrite of a sequence of (syntax) definitions? Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] equivalent rewrite of a sequence of (syntax) definitions? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] equivalent rewrite of a sequence of (syntax) definitions? Daniel Villeneuve
• [Scheme-reports] discrepancies in formal library syntax: begin and include-library-declarations Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] discrepancies in formal library syntax: begin and include-library-declarations John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined? Aaron W. Hsu
• [Scheme-reports] Missing parenthesis in bytevector-u8-set! example code Justin Ethier
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Missing parenthesis in bytevector-u8-set! example code John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Return value for unmatched cond-expand Christian Stigen Larsen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Return value for unmatched cond-expand John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Return value for unmatched cond-expand Christian Stigen Larsen
• [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries Christian Stigen Larsen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries Christian Stigen Larsen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries Peter Bex
  • [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF Joseph Wayne Norton
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF Joseph Wayne Norton
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF Peter Bex
• [Scheme-reports] Overview of R7RS-small John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Overview of R7RS-small Malcolm Tredinnick
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Overview of R7RS-small John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-n.pdf raw source text? Joseph Wayne Norton
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-n.pdf raw source text? John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Implied equality Biep
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Implied equality Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Implied equality Biep
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Implied equality John Cowan
  • [Scheme-reports] Onderwerp: Re: Implied equality Biep
• [Scheme-reports] Tracking change in the Scheme reports John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Tracking change in the Scheme reports Malcolm Tredinnick
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Tracking change in the Scheme reports John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Sascha Ziemann
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Sascha Ziemann
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 leppie
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 leppie
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 leppie
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 leppie
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Vassil Nikolov
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 Mark H Weaver
• [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] confusing example in 6.11. Exceptions Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] confusing example in 6.11. Exceptions Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] confusing example in 6.11. Exceptions leppie
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] confusing example in 6.11. Exceptions Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] Comments on R7RS, draft 7 Steve Hafner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on R7RS, draft 7 Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on R7RS, draft 7 Arthur A. Gleckler
• [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd] Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd] Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd] Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd] Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd] Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
• [Scheme-reports] John Cowan votes for `r6rs` (operational equivalence) John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan votes for `r6rs` (operational equivalence) Arthur A. Gleckler
• [Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make Mark H Weaver
• [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS Sascha Ziemann
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comments to R7RS-small draft John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan
  • [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver

• Earlier messages
• Later messages