r7rs-core and r7rs-common On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Denis Washington <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 31.08.2011 00:43, schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler: >> "r7rs-big" and "r7rs-small" are perfectly good names. > > In my opinion, they are awful. What should the reports be named, then? > "The Small Report on [...] Scheme" and "The Big Report on [...] Scheme"? > Sounds like they are differently detailed reports on the same thing, > which is clearly not the case. > > I think we need something better. > > Regards, > Denis > > > _______________________________________________ > Scheme-reports mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports >
-- http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
