> > So I'm not basing my argument against the "revision" term on some vague > notion of edit distance, but on the fact that the upcoming reports > present a substantial semantic restructuring in that they redefine what > Scheme actually is - a "language tower" rather than a single language, > if you will. >
We've always had such ideas. Earlier versions of the report identified certain features as optional, for example. It's only a matter of degree.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
