John Cowan scripsit: > That's reasonable: in fact, SCM doesn't support exact/exact complex > numbers either, which is perfectly fine. It just means that no > general complex number can be real.
I've filed a ticket to add the R6RS `real-valued`, `rational-valued`, and `integer-valued` procedures to R7RS: they have the R5RS semantics around non-real numbers with inexact zero imaginary parts, though R6RS doesn't explicitly say so. -- Work hard, John Cowan play hard, [email protected] die young, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan rot quickly. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
