Vitaly Magerya writes: [snip much]
> Finally, in many places where a function is described the report > first says "it is an error if [...]" and only then describes what > the function does. Can we reverse this order? Seconded. From what I remember in the draft that I last read - which is not the current draft - some of the "it is an error if" statements could be removed, since the type of the argument is already specified unobtrusively by the argument name in the entry head. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
