Alex Shinn scripsit: > The format has always been that the prototype specifies the basic > types, and additional domain restrictions immediately follow as the > first line of the specification. This keeps all domain info together, > so I'm inclined not to diverge from the traditional format here - if > anyone wants to swap the order we'd need a vote.
Well, if you insist. This is not a substantive change to Scheme, just putting the basic purpose of a function before its domain conditions. But, sigh, ticket #343 filed. > Of course we should remove redundant domain restrictions already > implied by the prototype. That has been done, though some cases may have been overlooked. -- Samuel Johnson on playing the violin: John Cowan "Difficult do you call it, Sir? [email protected] I wish it were impossible." http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
