I see that the report decided that the `_', `else', `...', etc auxiliary syntaxes are to be bound in (scheme base). That's probably a good thing. Good job. I guess they'd be bound like:
(define-syntax else (syntax-rules ()) Does that definition need to go in the report, along with the definition of `cond' et al? I do suspect that people that aren't used to bound auxiliary syntax will find it a bit odd. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
