On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> wrote: > I see that the report decided that the `_', `else', `...', etc auxiliary > syntaxes are to be bound in (scheme base). That's probably a good > thing. Good job. I guess they'd be bound like: > > (define-syntax else (syntax-rules ()) > > Does that definition need to go in the report, along with the definition > of `cond' et al? >
I don't think so. Any definition will do - the purpose of the definitions of derived syntax is to show non-trivial definitions. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
