On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 10:20:41PM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Peter Bex scripsit: > > > This looks interesting, but will require some more experimentation > > before being generally acceptable, I think. I'm wary of things like > > this, as it seems a lot like the unholy idea that all DSSSL-style > > keywords must be bound. > > Apropos that, you might want to look at KeywordArgumentsArcfide, which > requires keywords (not DSSSL keywords, but colon-ized keywords) to be > bound. The nice feature is that it's pure R5RS + records.
That's what I had in mind when I wrote the word "unholy". Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
