On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > The solution some suggest is just to using renaming. [...] I could > > try to prefix the SRE identifiers consistently, e.g. `rx:' and > > `rx?', except oops, the underlying SRE engine doesn't know these > > names! > > If it's hygienic -- ie, if it's comparing identifiers, then it would > work fine. No impasse. > The underlying engine is irregex. It _can't_ be hygienic even if I wanted it to - it's not a macro language. It shouldn't be a macro language either, otherwise you couldn't dynamically generate SREs which would really suck. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
