Thanks to all who worked on this. Congratulations.
The latter half of this prose in eq? entry is the addition in this draft
(p.31):
The eq? procedure is similar to eqv? except that in some
cases it is capable of discerning distinctions finer than those
detectable by eqv?. It must always return #f when eq? also
would, but may return #f in some cases where eq? would
return #t.
Does the subject "it" in the second sentense means 'eqv?'? I'm a bit
confused, for taking this "it" as `eq?' and replacing the two `eq?' in
the sentence for `eqv?' seems to make more sense, making the second
sentence augmenting the first sentence.
Does the new sentence specifically tell there's a case that (eq? a b) => #t
but (eqv? a b) => #f?
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Alex Shinn <[email protected]> wrote:
> The 10th and final draft is available at:
>
> http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/raw-attachment/wiki/WikiStart/r7rs.pdf
>
> This includes the changes from the 9th draft listed at
>
> http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/NinthDraftEditorialCorrections
>
> The only significant change was the reversal to the R5RS
> semantics for eq? and eqv?, as discussed earlier on this
> list. Any further changes will be collected in a separate
> errata document.
>
> I'd like to thank the WG members for all their hard work
> over the past three years, in particular John Cowan and
> Arthur Gleckler. I'd also like to thank the Steering Committee
> for their guidance, and the editors of the R6RS, R5RS and
> earlier reports, and SRFIs which form the basis of the report.
>
> Mostly I'd like to thank the community for their constant
> feedback. We did our best to make everyone happy, and
> no doubt fell short in some areas, but we're proud of the
> result.
>
> The work is not over, of course. WG2 is actively seeking
> volunteers to help with standard libraries, which are using
> the SRFI process. If you wanted more say in the small
> language, now is your chance to join in!
>
> --
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scheme-reports mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
>
>
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
