Shiro Kawai scripsit: > Does the subject "it" in the second sentense means 'eqv?'? I'm a bit > confused, for taking this "it" as `eq?' and replacing the two `eq?' in > the sentence for `eqv?' seems to make more sense, making the second > sentence augmenting the first sentence.
The latter is what is meant; a last-minute formatting improvement accidentally removed the "v" in both instances of "eqv?". I have updated the draft in place. -- John Cowan [email protected] http://ccil.org/~cowan "The exception proves the rule." Dimbulbs think: "Your counterexample proves my theory." Latin students think "'Probat' means 'tests': the exception puts the rule to the proof." But legal historians know it means "Evidence for an exception is evidence of the existence of a rule in cases not excepted from." _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
