Hi Alex, 2013/12/1 Alex Shinn <[email protected]>: > Hi Yuichi, > > On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yuichi Nishiwaki > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> Looking over the r7rs draft, I found <bytevector> is missed out from >> <pattern datum> definition at 7.1.5. Transformers. > > > This is not an oversight. <bytevector>, along with <string>, is > a <simple datum>, and <pattern datum> are only defined on > <compound datum>s. >
You maybe made some misreading (or I misread your mail). I'm just talking about <pattern datum>, but not <pattern>. If <bytevector> is a <simple datum> as you said should it be added to the list just like below? <pattern datum> -> <string> | <character> | <boolean> | <number> | <bytevector> # <- me! -- Yuichi Nishiwaki _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
