On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Yuichi Nishiwaki <[email protected] > wrote:
> > You maybe made some misreading (or I misread your mail). I'm just > talking about <pattern datum>, but not <pattern>. If <bytevector> is a > <simple datum> as you said should it be added to the list just like below? > > <pattern datum> -> <string> > | <character> > | <boolean> > | <number> > | <bytevector> # <- me! > Indeed, sorry, I thought you wanted to be able to destructure bytevectors in patterns. Yes, it should be added to <pattern datum> as you say. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
