Hallo, On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Peter Bex <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't see why this has to be. It will just exclude small > specialised implementations which would still like to support > a standardised library if it fits its intended use cases. > For example, Chibi Scheme might decide to ship a few WG2 modules, > but you can compile it without bignum support. Does that mean > it isn't WG2-compatible? > > Is not this precisely the reason why R7RS was split in two? I do not see the point of small specialized implementations trying to conform to R7RS-large. Cheers, -- -alex http://unendli.ch/
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
