Just to mention, there is nothing wrong with implementations providing optimized versions of portable packages. In many cases (99%+) R6RS packages (aka a bunch of libraries) runs without issues on many implementations. A portable package should still be able to run on any implementation regardless of the optimized version.
> Part of R7RS-large is to get those standard names at least for a > reasonable set of packages. > Note that this will only work (for some values of "work") for packages > with portable implementations. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
