Use the CC0 instead, it has the same effect as the current license. Anyway, I am happy with how it is now, so you don't have to change it,
> On Jun 27, 2014, at 3:35, Kevin Wortman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wonder whether future Report documents could be licensed CC-BY. There might > be less confusion with a widely-recognized license. > > Kevin Wortman > > >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:27 AM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: >> [email protected] scripsit: >> >> > Has all contributors agreed to allow unlimited modification, >> > reproduction and redistribution of the RnRS standards? >> >> Yes. And that should be enough. >> >> -- >> John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] >> The experiences of the past show that there has always been a discrepancy >> between plans and performance. --Emperor Hirohito, August 1945 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scheme-reports mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports >
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
