On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:09 PM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:
> SAITO Atsushi scripsit: > > > I found cause of confusing in R7RS. <literal> was used in two sense > > on 4.3.2 & 7.1.3. I suggest that give another name. > > This is not technically a problem, but I would change the use in 4.3.2 > to <pattern literal>. Alex, Arthur? > I generally refer to both as just literals, and they're not part of the same BNF, but I have no objection to <pattern literal>. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
