Hi Ulrich,
Regarding the LaTeX export, I'm afraid I don't have specific knowledge
on that topic, so I'm not able to provide useful input.
As for the PGN date format: yes, section 8.1.1.3: "The Date tag value
field always uses a standard ten character format: YYYY.MM.DD".
Therefore, [Date "0863.??.??"] is correct.
For games or studies with multiple authors, a common practice is to use
other tags, such as Annotator, or any custom tag name you find suitable.
Bye,
Fulvio
On 2/1/26 15:49, Ulrich Dirr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any chance that the LaTeX export will be modernized?
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I also noticed that errors appear when importing a PGN file that
contains data before 1000. E.g. I have a study database with studies
from arabs like Al Adli dating back to year 863! Maybe the PGN is wrong?
[Date "863.??.??"] should it be [Date "0863.??.??"]?
>
> I am also interested in your opinion on how best to treat games or
studies that have more than one player on one side. For example, in
consultation games or studies with several composers.
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
