On 01/09/2014 02:37 PM, Bluejay Adametz wrote: > My US$0.02, it seems like maybe RedHat wants something in between the > stable, solid, reliable, and, yes, sometimes dated Enterprise Linux > and the wild & crazy :) world of Fedora. As far i understood nothing will change with regard of data path for distribution of CentOS (it will be the same process of taking _released_ srpms, clean up, rebuild). RH just extend an administrative umbrella (and some significant support) over the CentOS organization.
Anyway, as rebuilding and re-branding is quite intensive i was wondering if the differences between centos and sl could be packed in some repo (as most (that i know of) of the cern scientific software is already put into). What technical differences would be between CentOS + scientific repo and SL? Just a personal thought, but maybe this would free some human resources for maintaining a lot of scientific (and IT/grid related) packages in well established repos (like epel, fedora/rpmfusion) Thanks! Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature