Ok. I'ld like SL as independent... not as variant. SL has a great community and it's a great distro. IMHO :)
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Mark Stodola <stod...@pelletron.com> wrote: > > On 12/17/2014 04:25 PM, Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo wrote: > >> I mean, if SL will become a CentOS variant or not. >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com >> <mailto:smo...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 17 December 2014 at 14:49, Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo >> <wasp...@gmail.com <mailto:wasp...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi guys... >> >> What about CentOS variant for SL?... Still planning, or this >> kind of "merging" will not apply? >> >> >> I think it is going to take a lot more context for anyone to >> understand what you are meaning. >> >> >> -- >> Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo >> *Tg.* Análisis y Desarollo de Sistemas de Información >> Linux user #487547 >> >> >> >> -- >> Stephen J Smoogen. >> >> >> >> -- >> Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo >> *Tg.* Análisis y Desarollo de Sistemas de Información >> Linux user #487547 >> > > I think the answer to that is no. The SL team made a decision to continue > to spin their own independent set of packages and not become an add-on > repository to the CentOS build. > > Someone please correct me if I am wrong... > > -Mark > -- Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo *Tg.* Análisis y Desarollo de Sistemas de Información Linux user #487547
