I believe we are planning to archive the content. Pat
On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 23:00 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > [EXTERNAL] – This message is from an external sender > > I can see it myself from home. I do note that RHEL 7 is being > obsoleted within a couple of months. Will the Scientific Linux 7 at > this site be archived, or kept alive indefinitely? > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 4:41 PM Patrick Riehecky <riehe...@fnal.gov> > wrote: > > > > I'll take a look! > > > > Pat > > > > On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 20:34 +0000, Seth Lohr wrote: > > > > > > [EXTERNAL] – This message is from an external sender > > > > > > > > > Since 2024-03-24 (5 days ago) there's been an uptick in issues > > > when > > > trying to rsync off this URI: > > > > > > > > > rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/ > > > > > > > > > This is the error we're getting > > > > > > > > > Error message: > > > @ERROR: max connections (150) reached -- try again later > > > rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at > > > main.c(1656) [Receiver=3.1.2] > > > > > > > > > The various looking around I've done seems to point to stuck > > > connections in some capacity, but I'm unsure whether this is a > > > problem on our side (client) or if it's an issue with > > > scientificlinux > > > only being able to handle 150 concurrent connections on the rsync > > > port. > > > > > > > > > Am I alone in being the only person to see this issue start in > > > the > > > last week? We've been syncing the repository since at least > > > 2013. > > > Issues like this come up sporadically, but in the last 22 syncs > > > since > > > the 24th, this issue has happened 13 times of of the 22. The > > > other > > > times, our since finished in about 1 min or two. > > > > > > > >
