On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 03:24:43 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > This is fine if I am the only manager of the computer. [snip] > It is best if one could use the tools recommended by, supplied by > and document by the vendor - I want to run "RHEL/SL Linux", > not "Konstantin's Linux". [snip]
Wow. You get it. Majorly customized systems that are poorly documented are ticking timebombs; and you recognize that fact. Bravo. I agree with your assessment 100%. > P.P.S. What about documentation for the NetworkManager? [snip] > SL seems to use the "ifcfg-rh" plugin, so we go to > that section, and behold, here are documented all the NM-special > ifcfg-eth0 settings. > Here is the URL, scroll down to the section "ifcfg-rh" > http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager/SystemSettings Thanks so much for all that legwork; this is good information, and thank you for taking the time to pass it on to the list!
